Body:
For decades, the political landscape in America has seen principal players of all utilizing their platforms to enact their vision for the country. Recently, one name has emerged amid traditional political families, no stranger to national attention – Kamala Harris. As the vice president of the immeasurable United States of America, all indications point to the possibility of her assuming the highest office in the country. Naturally, a Kamala Harris presidency provokes a question – how negative or positive could it be for the country?
Kamala Harris has a deep-rooted history in jurisprudence. With a flourishing career in law, she has been known for her stern stance on crime and her relentless pursuit of justice. This intrinsic commitment to upholding legal principles could especially shine within a presidential office, acting as a beacon to guard the country’s legislative system. However, her critics argue that Harris has showcased a tendency to understand the law in her way, deepening the apprehension around her presidential potential.
Economically, Harris’s presidency may incite a distinct shift towards progressive policies. She has shown support for Medicare For All, the Green New Deal, and an expansive social safety net—all profound deviations from conservative economic philosophies. However, these policies are not without their critics. Concerns over cost and the expansion of federal control continue to foster heated debates. The increase in taxes for the affluent under Harris’s watch is another contentious point in the economic equation.
What cannot be debated is the symbolic significance of a Harris presidency. As the first woman of color to hold the office of Vice President, a presidency for Harris could resonate as a resonating sign of progress and equal representation. Added to this, her Jamaican and Indian heritage might influence her international politics approach, potentially strengthening diplomatic ties with these regions.
In domestic policymaking, Harris’s presidency could constitute progress in areas of racial and social justice matters. Her stance on immigration reform, gun control, and criminal justice signifies a leftward push, promising a progressive approach toward these issues despite sparking potential conflicts with those favoring stricter policies.
When it comes to defense and national security, Harris has been considerably more reticent. While she has echoed fellow democrats’ call for a reduced defense budget, she has also warned against the threats posed by Russia and other foreign actors— showing an unambiguous advocacy for latter American involvement overseas.
Predicting the impacts of a future Kamala Harris presidency accurately can be an uphill task. It would depend largely on the balance of power within Congress, the state of national and international affairs, as well as the nation’s overall mood during her stint. Indubitably, her presidency could be symbolic and historic, yet it may also incite polarizing views based on political affiliations and ideologies.
Although her strident progressive stance might appeal to liberal demographics, it could result in pushback from those favoring conservative policies. As with any presidency, Kamala Harris’s reign would likely have its highs and lows, and like her predecessors
